The Supreme Court in Kampala has stayed the execution of the Constitutional Court ruling which expelled from parliament, six MPs representing newly created municipalities.
In its December, 27,2019 ruling, the Constitutional Court said that the six MPs from new municipalities were in Parliament illegally since they had not been elected through a general election, neither had they come to the house through a by-election.
The judges explained that there was no vacancy existing or created in Parliament by the mere fact of creation of municipalities.
“Under article 81 (2) where a vacancy exists in Parliament, a by election will be held within 60 days after a vacancy has occurred provided it is not less than after six months from the conclusion of general elections. No vacancy had occurred because as noted above, all 20 existing constituencies had been represented in the 2016 general elections,” the judges ruled.
The MPs who were affected include Patrick Ocan(Apac Municipality), Dr Elioda Tumwesigye(Sheema Municipality), Tarsis Rwaburindore Bishanga(Ibanda Municipality MP), Hashim Sulaiman(Nebbi Municipality),Abrahams Lokii(Kotido Municipality), and Asuman Basalirwa for Bugiri Municipality from parliament for in newly created municipalities which had not been demarcated by the Electoral Commission.The Attorney General later appealed against the Constitutional Court judgment.
The expulsion followed a petition by former Bufumbira East MP Eddie Kwizera to the Constitution Court against the six legislators.
The Attorney General and Electoral Commission appealed against the Constitutional Court judgment in the Supreme Court.
On Thursday 4 June, the seven Supreme Court justices including Esther Kisaakye, Stella Arach Amoko, Opio Aweri, Lillian Tibatemwa, Richard Buteera, Mike Chibita and Paul Mugamba directed that the six MPs should stay in parliament as they await the outcome of the main case in which they are challenging the lower court’s judgment.
“We find that the applicants have demonstrated seriousness to pursue the appeal and the application was lodged without undue delay,” the court ruled.
The justices argued that if the affected MPs are kicked out of parliament before their appeal is disposed of, the outcome of the main case may be rendered useless.
“We find that the intended appeal involves matters of significant public importance and raises serious constitutional and legal matters which warrant determination by this Court.
It is the duty of this court to ensure that the intended appeals if successful are not rendered nugatory.